SloppyNoodle.com
nav_line
home
nav_line
issues
nav_line
emerse
nav_line
Care
nav_line
about
nav_line

 

SloppyNoodle.com Updates

From my heart to yours Devotion

Darlene Zschech Inspiration



  “Why I am Not an Evolutionist …”

              The Science Lecture Class Handout

 By Andy Carmichael © 2003

Creation School Online with Andy Carmichael is hosted

at the website www.SloppyNoodle.com/ev.html

                 Andy_Ally@hotmail.com

1.     Introduction

“The evolutionary record leaks like a sieve … The general scientific world has been bamboozled into believing that evolution has been proved. Nothing could be further from the truth.”

(Sir Fred Hoyle, evolutionist, atheist, astronomer, cosmologist, mathematician and Professor of Astronomy at Cambridge University [1] )

“One of the reasons evolution continues to survive is that paleontologists believe geneticists have the real evidence [for evolution], and geneticists believe that paleontologists have the evidence, and so on around the various specialties within biology, each man passing the buck for evidence to the next man. Since professionals in different disciplines rarely talk with one another about such matters, the myth of overwhelming support for evolution continues. …

Sometimes people ask me how virtually all the evolutionists in the world could be so wrong about such an important issue as human origins. Answer : it wouldn’t be the first time.”

(Dr Gary Parker, PhD in biology, creationist scientist, biologist and palaeontologist, former university lecturer in evolution, Science Faculty Fellow of the US National Science Foundation, Creation Facts of Life, 1997 [2] )

“Regardless of how robustly dogmatic assertions to the contrary may be, even if they are made by the American Association for the Advancement of Science and endorsed by fifty thousand scientists, human evolution is simply not proven.”

(William Fix, evolutionist, 1984 [3] )

“I really do think that people have been so brainwashed into believing that evolution is a proven fact rather than one possible interpretation of the facts (which is a very different matter), that they are extremely surprised to find a practising scientist who at least appears to be intelligent espousing the cause of the Biblical account. … It is possible to be wholly scientific and at the same time to accept the opening chapters of Genesis as sober history. I think that what’s required is that we recognise that science has its limitations.”

(Professor E.H. Andrews, PhD, creationist scientist and Professor of Material Science at Queen Mary College, London University [4] )

“A person may choose any group of animals or plants, large or small, or pick one at random. He may then go to a library and with some patience he will be able to find a qualified author who says that the evolutionary origin of that form is not known.”

(Dr Bolton Davidheiser, zoologist and creationist scientist, 1969 [5] )

“Science does not claim a 10 billion year history of the world. Such a claim is beyond its scope. It only claims that, if we assume that the present laws of nature were always in force, then the world is that old. But, according to the simple meaning of the Torah’s narrative, the world – and the laws of nature with it – were created 5,740 years ago. This denies the non-scientific assumption of the scientists and does not quarrel with their scientific reasoning. In other words, the Torah does not at all contradict the claims of science, but only the hypothesis of scientists, which is not science at all.”

(Leo Levi, Jewish scholar, 1983 [6] )

“I know of no finding in archaeology that’s properly confirmed which is in opposition to the Scriptures. The Bible is the most accurate history textbook the world has ever seen.”

(Dr Clifford Wilson, former Director of the Australian Institute of Archaeology [7] )

“There is no evidence based solely on solar observations that the Sun is 4.5-5 x 109 [i.e. 4.5 to 5 billion] years old. I suspect that the sun is 4.5 billion years old. However, given some new and unexpected results to the contrary, and some time for frantic recalculation and theoretical readjustment, I suspect that we could live with Bishop Ussher’s value for the age of the earth and sun [i.e. 6,000 years old]. I don’t think we have much in the way of observational evidence in astronomy to conflict with that.”

(Dr John Eddy, PhD in Astrogeophysics, Solar Astronomer at the High Altitude Observatory at Boulder, Colorado, Geotimes, 1978 [8] )

Advertisment Header




Mercy Ministries

Mercy Ministries Mercy Ministries Australia Mercy Ministries USA Mercy Ministries UK Mercy Ministries Canada

PluggedIn

 

 

copyright